Is it about being “impressive”?
Well, fair enough. To me, anyone living up to human rights, is impressive to me. I don’t need an impressive logo - just a recognizable one.
Is it about being “impressive”?
Well, fair enough. To me, anyone living up to human rights, is impressive to me. I don’t need an impressive logo - just a recognizable one.
Still think you/we should go for the Human Rights logo…
Article 8 is about the right to privacy.
I get your point and idea. And I agree, there should be a symbol. But in a world full of symbols, where there is lot of symbols that overlap or mean the same thing, it’s not a great thing to ad more symbols.
I would suggest, that people instead use the symbol for human rights. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Rights_Logo
This logo stand for rights and freedom, which is not in opposition to anything, but for something. Article 8 in the Human Rights, are about the right to privacy:
This should be enough. I’d suggest people use this, and support human rights in general.
No wonder. A shame that people didn’t want to support neither Firefox OS or other free Mobile OS…
But you do know that Tor/VPN is not really privacy, nor security? It hides your IP, but that’s about it. If you still login, and give any information, and that could just be your “fingerprint” you are not anonymous…
I do like Mint very much, but I think that they are neglecting to update their apps. A lot of apps are not up to date, and that’s just sad…
Based on linux is no guarantee for stable, secure or privacy respecting software. Android is based on Linux. :-) And so is Remarkable, and some of the e-book readers.
I really like both the idea behind e-book readers and Remarkable, but they are often a very closed environment, so forget about most FOSS, if any. They want to make money on you, and that stops, if you use other software than theirs.