gtk3, gtk4 (probably?) qt, qt in flatpak, gtk3 in flatpak, gtk4 in flatpak (probably)… I’m just not fighting it anymore

  • MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    This is the kind of shit that stops people from migrating to Linux.

    Lack of consistency in the UI. We’re in 2025 dammit. Not 1995.

    • unfinished | 🇵🇸@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s sad that this gets downvoted to hell. As a MacOS user who appreciates beautiful UI, this is a major pain point for me on Linux. And yes, Windows is the absolute worst at this.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Edit: okay, WTF Windows is now even worse?!?

      Always has been. At least since NT. Company culture encourages features and discourages fixes. Thus it got framework after framework.

    • communism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      How is a kernel meant to enforce anything about UI?

      I think GUI development should favour server-side decorations for consistency’s sake, but this is more of a cultural thing with what application developers are choosing to do, rather than anything “Linux” can do about.

    • TriangleSpecialist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      This below is windows 11 consistency, within their own os context menus. I am not even starting on the fact that window decorations there too are a non standardised mess.

      I agree that lack of UI consistency is less than ideal, and very real in Linux, but let’s not pretend that this is the main issue stopping people from migrating (from an equally inconsistent OS)