• u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    For me it’s 10 days. I expect some automated monitoring with unencrypted messaging services. But automated things should work more or less immediately.
    I wonder what went on for the 10 days. Was most of it waiting for manual review, FBI taking the time with… something, whatever else.

    • SheeEttin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Investigation. Snapchat flags it, someone reviews it and sends it to the FBI. The FBI sees it, reviews it, and gets all their ducks in a row to build a case and present an arrest warrant to get signed by a judge. Then they schedule a time and place to find her and actually perform the arrest.

      10 days for that is quick. It’s not like Snapchat’s filter flags it and sends it right to an arresting agent.

    • AreaKode@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      You ever contact the police? They aren’t there to stop crime. They are there to take a report after the crime has been committed. If there were welfare queen CEOs involved, the swat team would have arrived within 5 minutes. But this incident didn’t involve “real” people.

      • turtlesareneat@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        My SO is a therapist with a client who’s being stalked by a severely mentally ill man. Her children are being stalked. I’m like - yes, police reports and whatnot, but they all need to have guns at this point, because the police aren’t going to stop it, and this guy is determined.

        They are going to arm themselves.

          • turtlesareneat@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            The client knew of me, that I have been stalked and gay bashed, and asked my husband to get my take. Therapists are allowed to share relevant details about their own lives if it’s helpful, it’s unusual for clients to follow up on them tho. I don’t have their name, just their situation, which is vague enough to share here.

            • Breezy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              So not only is your SO talking about you and youre past but they’re sharing their patients info with you? No no thats not how that should work. You or your SO could be lieing and leading people into giving out info they shouldnt.

              I meam fuck youre posting on here describing their situation. Your SO should be fired.

            • Breezy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              Does it? I wouldnt want MY THERAPIST telling my shit to others but only leaving out my name.

              • thedruid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                Dude. It’s the internet. Consider everything false until verified.

                In this case though, yes generalizations without personal identifiable information are shared all the time.