The title is a bit clickbaity but that’s the only story on this I could find and according to the rules, post needs to match the article’s title. Anyways, they are claiming that the government is in possession of the full video with the minute intact, not that the footage posted wasn’t missing a minute
Couldn’t even read the short summary…
Oh I see. You’re accusing me of not reading it when I’m simply not convinced.
Welp Pam bondi saying “there’s always a missing minute” doesn’t really factor when the video is spliced together and demonstrably so.
They are accusing you of not reading the article OP posted, or even the two sentence summary OP included in their post body.
Oh well I did. Sounds like you guys didn’t really apply any critical thinking to what you read though.
Pam Bondi: “Trust me bro”
Me: Lmao no
You: “RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE”
I have absolutely no clue how you have concluded from anything I’ve said in this thread (or anywhere, frankly) that I trust anything Bondi says.
The article OP posted is about a government source that supports your stance.
Dude lol. You cannot be this stupid
Dead link? Not sure what you mean there. Here’s the important parts of the link I provided.
Here’s the relevant part of the summary that they’re saying you didn’t read.
And you are trusting blindly.
I’ve provided evidence. You’re giving me pam bondis trust me bro.
No, this whole thread is about you jumping to conclusions and talking about the wrong video. Nobody here is supporting Pam Bondi or her claims/lies. We’re just questioning your reading comprehension skills.
“they” in this sentence is not Pam Bondi.
(well, presumably. That would be a hell of a twist)
Stop trying to “win” for 8 seconds and read the damn sentence. Nobody is supporting Bondi. Nobody is trusting anything blindly. You’re railing against something that wasn’t even claimed by Bondi or anyone else.
They are so completely incapable of admitting that they did not read the article or OP’s summary before posting.