The title is a bit clickbaity but that’s the only story on this I could find and according to the rules, post needs to match the article’s title. Anyways, they are claiming that the government is in possession of the full video with the minute intact, not that the footage posted wasn’t missing a minute

  • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Oh I see. You’re accusing me of not reading it when I’m simply not convinced.

    Welp Pam bondi saying “there’s always a missing minute” doesn’t really factor when the video is spliced together and demonstrably so.

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      They are accusing you of not reading the article OP posted, or even the two sentence summary OP included in their post body.

      • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Oh well I did. Sounds like you guys didn’t really apply any critical thinking to what you read though.

        Pam Bondi: “Trust me bro”

        Me: Lmao no

        You: “RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE”