The title is a bit clickbaity but that’s the only story on this I could find and according to the rules, post needs to match the article’s title. Anyways, they are claiming that the government is in possession of the full video with the minute intact, not that the footage posted wasn’t missing a minute
They are accusing you of not reading the article OP posted, or even the two sentence summary OP included in their post body.
Oh well I did. Sounds like you guys didn’t really apply any critical thinking to what you read though.
Pam Bondi: “Trust me bro”
Me: Lmao no
You: “RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE”
Dude lol. You cannot be this stupid
I have absolutely no clue how you have concluded from anything I’ve said in this thread (or anywhere, frankly) that I trust anything Bondi says.
The article OP posted is about a government source that supports your stance.