I mean to say the numbering system 1, 4, 7-12 to indicate slices of data, not the UI 🤣

other possibilities: 1, 4, 7-rest (“7 through the rest of the slices”) or 1, 4, 7… (“7 through the rest of the slices”)

and provide it as sample input to the user when they first try to print something, that should give them an idea of how to use your numbering system

Microsoft’s print dialog offers custom ranges of pages in an intuitive way, see above

You could demonstrate the numbering system for the users, maybe once at startup. Make it the first thing they see

You mean discriminatory, not racist. It’s not possible to be racist towards white people in a country where white people are the oppressors.

I’m angry too but there MUST be better solutions to these problems than genocide. It’s easy to wave your hand and say “make them gone forever” but it’s lazy and cruel. If you want it fixed, put the time in. Genocide is for pussies.

aaaand now those kids will never tell anyone their thoughts about school violence. good job.

Crash bandicoot was written in lisp

Of course they could. Did I suggest they couldn’t.

You’re backpedaling. Stand by your words.

the guy didn’t include the footage where he was winding up the cops

You didn’t read the article? There’s no need to provide that footage, it’s all cited in the source material.

Been a pleasure. Have a day.

They were capable of handling the situation without violence.

Do you really think every citizen who doesn’t comply with instructions should be punched in the face? What about people who panic and freeze up? Hard of hearing, or easily confused?

You are setting dangerous precedent if you tolerate this kind of abuse from law enforcement. Be better.

It’s a huge relief to talk to someone who gets it.

We have 130 billion dollars available to give to law enforcement. 800 billion to defense. And not a dollar to treatment and counseling for people with potentially harmful attractions? It doesn’t make sense. The first step should be discussion of the problem and potential solutions. I’d like to see research done into the attraction, find out if there are environmental causes (ie. preventable ones), treatment for people with the attraction (can it be replaced? is there a non-harmful maintenance that makes it tolerable without relapse?), and justice for the victims & families that includes more than revenge.

Because if it’s possible to criminalize attraction, someone will use that to criminalize attractions that they don’t like. Homosexuality would be a crime in the same year.

You’re backpedaling because you know you’re wrong.

Bye!

You won’t have to wait long.

You’re welcome for the lesson, by the way. Next one is on you, though.

Read the article. Your question is answered in there.

This is a tragically close-minded opinion. You sound hurt and angry. I hope you get well.

I would argue that the ruling is correct. Child abuse should always be reported. But it shouldn’t lead instantly to jail. It should lead instantly to therapy, support, counseling and a plan of action which protects the person and the children in their life from harm.

Good point here: as a country we should be doing MUCH better to stop pedophiles from dealing with their issues

Just throwing the book at people who hurt kids isn’t working. Kids are still getting hurt every day. There’s far, far more pedophiles in our society than anyone realizes. The reason they’re not getting help is because everyone says, “instantly to jail for life” instead of trying to figure out where the problem comes from. They stay in hiding, hurting people in secret because there is no support for them anywhere.

I agree with this: We demonize pedophilia to the point that people would kill someone that is attracted to children.

Most people would make it illegal to have that attraction. It’s a slippery slope and I guarantee same-sex attraction would be next.

You’re invalidating his opinion by creating false criteria (being “news”) then failing it arbitrarily. You’re not offering definitions or reasoning, so I’m asking some leading questions to give you a chance to redeem yourself.

But instead of answering, you backpedaled. So now you are dismissed.

Hitchens’s razor: What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

Bye bye :)

People care enough to comment in this thread :)

Are you saying his opinion doesn’t matter because he’s a game show host? What do you know about his qualifications? Have you ever looked him up?