Not really. You don’t like what I have to say, so you’re trying to get me censored by crying ‘ragebait.’

You’re another example of why censorship on the left drives people further to the right.

I’m going to block you now since I can tell you need the last reply.

These are Australian conservatives, they don’t value freedom of speech as much as American conservatives.

They are willing to abuse censorship to push their agendas, just like American liberals.

So that means the left isn’t censoring me as much as the right?

Where? I can say whatever I want on 4chan, but I come to any of the liberal social media sites and get banned for disagreeing with the crowd.

Your opinion sucks and isn’t going to be enacted by most users.

The people on the right aren’t censoring me for disagreeing with them.

Useful idiots on the left are the only ones attacking freedom of speech, saying its a dogwhistle.

Useful idiots on the left are the only ones trying to control narratives by controlling what information people are allowed to share.

I’m voting for Donald Trump because of Collective Shout.

Since neither candidate represents the working class and all we have is a culture war, I’m going to fight back against censorship wherever I can.

All of the people on the left pushing censorship and attacking freedom of speech are directly responsible for driving me further to the right.

Artistic value is subjective.

That clause shouldn’t hold up in a court.

Taking away our freedom of speech is something to go to war over.

If this trend of giving all the government power to companies continues, well, let’s just say I’m glad we have the 2nd amendment to fight back against tyranny.

I’m not going to live in a reddit cuck-world without a fight.

So much fucking censorship and agenda-pushing on the internet.

It makes me sick how many useful idiots are being herded like sheep just to satisfy those with more money than them.

You’re the one following me around and replying to my posts everywhere.

You’re projecting and I’m going to ignore you now because you’re also becoming a nuisance. Goodbye.

If you’re talking about yourself, then yes.

You’re incapable of recognizing when you’re wrong because your ego can’t handle it.

Yes… I have no problem assuming that you are average. Thus far you responded exactly how I expect your ilk to respond. You plug your ears to truths you don’t like so you don’t have to think about how your consumption habits can and should change.

If you valued my opinion of you, then I would have a higher opinion of you. I don’t expect that of you though, which is part of why you’re average.

I’m not going to assume that you are exceptional when you haven’t given me any reason to. Thus far, everything you’ve said is typical of people defending consumerism without any regard to magnitude.

Trying to argue that ‘there’s no ethical consumption’ (which I assume you believe) is a tactic you people use to avoid admitting how you’re part of the problem or that you can take steps to solve it. If I were to go live out in the woods, then you can point at me and say “See!? Either we spend as much money and consume as much as we can or live in the woods like a crazy person! There’s no in between!”

It’s not a purity test. You’re looking for any reason to make it seem like the person ordering doordash everyday is contributing to the problem at the same level as the person cooking their own meals every day. That’s not true and you’re going to get upset at me for pointing this out because it causes your cognitive dissonance to flare up.

No, but I contribute to it at a level that we all can participate in so I’m not part of the problem.

If you’re implying that I have to go live off in the woods or something to criticize consumerism, then you’re just looking for excuses to not consume less. You’ve been conditioned to believe it’s “all or nothing,” so any mitigation of your contribution doesn’t matter.

Really? Can you share sources of these projections?

I guess you don’t know what consumerism means, or you’re not willing to admit its drawbacks because you’re a part of it.

The average person has difficulty admitting when they are incorrect.

Yes, Reagen is considerably more responsible for the current economic landscape than orange man. Consumer culture is an even bigger contributor to the disparity in wealth than any politician.

But tribalism is strong on both sides, while both sides want to believe they’re above it.

It really puts into perspective how ‘intelligent’ the average person is these days.