• Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    AI providing incorrect information?! Too bad nobody could have seen this coming and warned these egotistical morons.

    “Durr we don’t need humans for anything bc a bunch of billionaire tech bros completely out of touch with reality who have no expertise or knowledge in anything outside of tech investment promised that AI will save us as long as we keep throwing money at it.”

    Elsa:

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      (They’re also not that good at tech investment, they just have a bunch of money and every once in a while a project makes even more money for them instead of crashing out)

  • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    The article says mint chocolate chip. I’m not 100% sure, but I think it looks more like roadkill rat balls barf ice-cream to me

      • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        In the short term, agreed. Over the longer term, I think enough of this will damage trust in US drugs which I expect to erode demand, while lowering the approval bar, increasing supply. Brands (the only thing left supporting confidence at that point) may also struggle, especially if some of them decide to cash in with questionable drugs for quick profits.

  • Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Of course it is. It’s an llm drawing from datasets based on our own tribal, unflinching rhetoric. And almost definitely guided through monetary benchmarks.

    And, kudos to the real journalists out there.

  • randompasta@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    They fired everyone competent so they could be more efficient at rubber stamping anything drug companies send their way.