• SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    The in-memory version of the tab template prevents having to restart FF to load the new one from disk now, but, at some point you’re still going to have to restart…

    I tend to hibernate my laptop, so it doesn’t reboot often… so surely I’m going to get to the point where FF needs a restart…

  • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    ‘those pesky “restart required” messages after an update?’

    Hmm so they want to make modifying my system without my permission even more seamless ?

    I’m not sure I like that very much…

    • Raptorox@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      See, when you update firefox while it’s running, opening a tab shows a big “Restart to continue browsing” screen

    • vga@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think this happens only when your firefox upgraded while you were using it. In Linux, that usually happens when you manually run an upgrade.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      webgpu makes me apprehensive. more precise fingerprinting and worse exploits could potentially be a thing.

      • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        The problem is that if Firefox does not support features like WebGPU, people will switch to Chrome once they notice web sites don’t work correctly.

        • Doorknob@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I guess not using it when everyone else is would be another way of fingerprinting too

        • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          yeah that’s part of the issue of letting google unilaterally control the most popular browser by far.

    • acidrain42@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I for one am extremely happy about the no force restart. It’s quite minor in the grand scheme of things, but it is so annoying.

      • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        True, its annoying, bit this does not take away the need for a restart of the process, obviously, just you can do it at a more convenient time.

        • acidrain42@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Absolutely, it’s only about convenience. I often miss the fact that firefox is in the list of all the packages that are getting updated and realize it only when I open a new tab and I get the error message, and that’s annoying. Very much a first world problem for sure!

    • vga@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago
      • No More Forced Restarts: This is a huge relief for many!. Firefox on Linux no longer requires a forced restart after your package manager applies an update. This means smoother, uninterrupted browsing, even during system updates.
      • Reduced Memory Usage: ForkServer leads to a significant reduction in memory consumption for content processes. The base resident memory for a content process is now around 50% lower. This helps Firefox run more efficiently, especially if you have many tabs open.
      • Faster Process Startup: You’ll notice that content process startup times are reduced by approximately 35%. This translates to snappier new tab openings and overall improved responsiveness.

      Sounds actually too good to be true to me.