• LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I hope they recover their vision. As someone who lost sight in one eye I can attest that going from binocular to monocular vision is life altering AND not considered a disability under the law Social Security requirements but typically is covered by ADA.

    Edit: clarification.

      • toomanypancakes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Because you still have eyesight in the other eye, so in social security’s mind there’s jobs in the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (the DOT) you could still perform, and if there’s three jobs you could perform despite your impairment you aren’t disabled. Also, if you’re under 50 you almost certainly aren’t disabled for some reason. It’s maddening.

        • Echolynx@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          A lot of states don’t even care if you’ve only got so-so vision in one eye and are completely blind in the other. No stereopsis, no problem! Here’s a driver’s license. Good luck.