• EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    The point is, I don’t care about the process so much, I care about the end result

    And here a lot of artists would disagree with you. Because for artists, the act of creating is as important as - if not even more important than - the end product. To quote a smart college student’s musings I once heard: “Art is how artists process life experiences.”

    The rest I agree with, AI is a tool and the biggest issues with it are the people who are creating it and the people abusing it and making life for artists worse. Adam Savage once said that someday some film student will do something really amazing with AI (and then Hollywood will steal it and copy it into the ground), but that hasn’t happened yet. He said that what he cares about when he looks at a piece is what he can see of the artist in that piece, and with AI, you see nothing.

    As an aside, there’s a real conversation to be had about how the word “consumer” has replaced all forms of interaction in our vocabulary. We no longer enjoy or appreciate art - we consume it; we’re not customers, we’re consumers, etc. But that’s not really relevant to the conversation except as a comment on how companies have pushed all forms of enjoyment down to the level of eating a fast food burger.

    • Krudler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Other dude doesn’t understand the difference between imaging and art. Art is the human perspective. This apparently is more than they can comprehend.

      • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Honestly, they’re not wrong, it’s just that most people don’t understand that aspect of why artists are so against AI.

        Art is also a conversation and a mirror. Entire artistic movements have been dedicated to creating pieces intended to evoke specific feelings in viewers.

        The story of the series of paintings titled Who’s Afraid of Red, Yellow and Blue and the attacks on them are a great example of all of the points that I’ve talked about. As Wikipedia says:

        Barnett Newman started the first painting in the series without a preconceived notion of the subject or end result; he only wanted it to be different from what he had done until then, and to be asymmetrical. But after having painted the canvas red, he was confronted with the fact that only the other primary colors yellow and blue would work with it; this led to an inherent confrontation with the works of De Stijl and especially Piet Mondrian, who had in the opinion of Newman turned the combination of the three colors into a didactic idea instead of a means of expression in freedom.

        Of the four paintings in the series, two would be attacked with knives, with a second failed attempt on one of them resulting in an attack on another of Newman’s paintings instead. All because of some big canvases with the three primary colors painted on them in simple stripes. The first painting to be attacked is literally a red canvas with a single stripe of blue on one end.