• rainwall@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Why? Seems perfectly reasonable to me. What’s the “correct” cut off for inclusion in a mountain range for a state?

      Seems like an arbitrary thing to say that California can’t be in Cascadia because only 190 of a 760 mile state have the mountain range in it.

      • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        More importantly, Cascadia is a fine name, even if it wasn’t attached to anything. A name that is pretty, distinct, and rolls off the tongue are all good features to have.