• rainwall@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Why? Seems perfectly reasonable to me. What’s the “correct” cut off for inclusion in a mountain range for a state?

    Seems like an arbitrary thing to say that California can’t be in Cascadia because only 190 of a 760 mile state have the mountain range in it.

    • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      More importantly, Cascadia is a fine name, even if it wasn’t attached to anything. A name that is pretty, distinct, and rolls off the tongue are all good features to have.