Donald Trump has said he will issue an executive order to mandate identification for all US elections, a move likely to be challenged in court as unconstitutional.

"Voter I.D. Must Be Part of Every Single Vote. NO EXCEPTIONS! I Will Be Doing An Executive Order To That End!!!,” the US president said on Truth Social late on Saturday.

Trump also claimed he wants to ban all voting by mail except for those who are very ill or in military service.

The US constitution grants primary authority to regulate elections to the US states, while empowering Congress to enact election laws or regulations. It gives no explicit authority to the president to regulate voting.

  • MeThisGuy@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    wait… so you guys are worried about having to identify yourself to vote?

    meanwhile you are registered multiple times a day through license plate identification, CCTV cameras, facial recognition, and not to mention your google/Apple device usage and browser and other digital fingerprinting

  • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can we 100% confirmed that Donny actually made this statement and that it wasn’t a body double? And also RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES.

  • andrewta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Give no explicit authority to the executive branch, but that isn’t gonna matter to Trump nor the Supreme Court

  • Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Fucking hell I hate to even say this, but this might be the first thing he has ever done that I might agree with. But hear me out before you crucify me.

    There isn’t rampant voter fraud near to the level MAGA claims. They imply it’s 50% fraudulent. It’s really like 1% or less, and most of that gets caught anyway already.

    I do think it is important to validate that the person casting the vote is registered and is the correct person casting the vote. But I would balance that requirement with common sense and I’d make getting any/all valid IDs easy and free (fully tax funded). From DL to Real ID to Military or whatever else. All free. All simple to get. All accessible to do. And I’d also make all elections a national holiday and expand mail in and online voting and early voting. Give people as much margin to get their vote in as possible.

    Elections do need security, hell, I’m still not entirely convinced that Elon didn’t do SOMETHING nefarious in this last one. He at very least was paying people which is illegal. But we need better encryptions and processes and forms of certifying that the ballots cast were indeed the correct intended vote and ways to go back and validate your own vote in a secure way. Make a portal where you can log in like your bank and see your vote history or something.

    While we’re at it. Abolish the damn college. Just make it all RCV and be done with all this shit with gerrymandering and arguing over the "least worst’ candidate every cycle.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I was typing up a comment to say this but when I really started thinking about it it’s not feasible to use IDs. The whole reason it’s unconstitutional is it directly targets poor people and prevents them from voting. ID centers would have to be open 7 days a week. All other forms of IDs needed to obtain a voter ID would also have to be free, and those places would have to be open 7 days also.

      There’s just too much that would have to go into making it fair for every citizen.

    • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Republicans would never win if they did all that, and Democrats would immediately be seriously challenged by Progressive candidates, so they aren’t interested either.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Trump is way too fucking lazy to press the shift key before every word. I just do not believe that he writes his own tweets. I’d like to see just one video of him visibly typing out a tweet that is then published. I’d bet that if you cross-referenced when his tweets are posted with his golf schedule, you’d find that at least some of them are written by somebody else.

  • itisileclerk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    In normal democratic countries “VoterID” is either National ID card or Passport. In “new” democratic countries (like mine) we sign the voter list (not the ballot), signature is compared visualy with signature on the ID card or Passport. Also picture from the ID card is printed on voter list so visual comparioson is made. Since last elections we are checked with fingerprint reader, again compared with fingerprint deposited when ID card or Passport was issued. Never had any problems or delays during voting. I bet US invented all that technology. But despite so many controls, there are many ways to commit voter fraud, especially in areas where voters are poor.

    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ever since I can remember, I’ve already had to sign the voter list in the US. No photo though, just a signature comparison. Also, the amount of voter fraud in the US is extremely low. Like usually less than 0.0001%.

    • impeccablepenguin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      In states that do not require an ID, you still need to present a document with your name. It is then compared with the voter registration database. The argument against requiring an ID is that ID’s aren’t free in the US, which can cause a financial hurdle for many.

      • Pyr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sounds like a solution would be some sort of national ID card provided for free?

        • xycu@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Republicans and conservatives, historically, have been the biggest opponents of a national ID because they don’t want the federal government tracking them or asserting any control over anything.

          Until trump, anyway…

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Heck, personal ID is not free in my country, either (I paid 43€ for a renewal last week), but it is mandatory, so everyone has it. Americans could do it even cheaper if they wanted.

        With so low levels of identity proof in the US, don’t complain about identity theft. Here, you simply can’t open a bank account with just an SSN drawn from the darknet and a self-printed electricity bill. Having a proper ID has many uses, way beyond identifying for your right to vote.

      • Uruanna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        And there’s additional hurdles for more targeted populations, like access to the place that gives you the ID, and the capacity to prove your ID to that place with specific documents that may ormay not exist. It’s on purpose.

  • Master@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Already have to do this in a lot of states. Have to show my drivers license and compare my signature in Alabama before I can vote.

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, that’s because the Constitution says it’s up to the states to manage their elections. It is not up to Congress, and it sure as shit is not a power of the President.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    He does care fuck if it is “legal” or “constitutional”. Those terms do no longer exist as criteria.