- Spotify is now asking UK users to prove their age to access mature content
- The age verification checks have been introduced as part of the UK’s Online Safety Act
- Spotify says it will present age checks if it suspects you’re under 13, but many users have encountered checks despite being over 18
Spotify has become the latest app to introduce measures designed to comply with the UK’s Online Safety Act, by asking users to undergo age verification checks if they want to view or listen to age-restricted content – and many users aren’t happy.
The age verification requirements of the Online Safety Act came into effect from July 25, and requires all platforms that display adult content to verify that users are over 18 using age verification checks.
So far, we’ve seen the likes of Xbox, Discord and Reddit introduce age verification, and now Spotify has done the same.
Latest Videos From TechRadar
Like Reddit and X, Spotify has partnered with digital identification firm Yoti, a service that conducts age checks via facial scanning. For Spotify users, Yoti will use different means of age verification, from facial scanning to requesting a scan of your ID if it suspects you’re under 13 (Spotify’s minimum age requirement).
It will also use algorithmic methods to estimate a user’s age. But Spotify is taking it a step further, stating in its official outline that “your account will be deactivated and eventually deleted” if you fail to complete the age verification process.
While Yoti claims that your data will be kept safe, and eventually deleted, the new requirement has caused uproar among some Spotify users.
Some have take to forums such as Reddit to point that young people are clever enough to find ways around the checks, for example using a VPN to change their location to somewhere other than the UK – and a minority have even threatened to revert to piracy (see below). What is ‘mature content’ in Spotify?
A phone on a green background showing a Peaches album on Spotify (Image credit: Spotify)
This is the burning question among Spotify fans, considering the music streaming app doesn’t host X-rated content on the same scale as Reddit or X. However, the platform does have certain features that are aimed at mature users.
In Spotify’s case, you may be asked to verify your age if you try to “access some Spotify content and features, like Music videos that are labeled as 18+ by rightsholders”. This could also apply to podcasts that discuss mature content and songs with explicit lyrics.
Fortunately, there is a way back if your account becomes deactivated due to an inaccurate age estimation. According to Spotify, you’ll get an email that “allows you to reactivate your account within 90 days of deactivation”, after which you’ll need to go through age verification checks again.
So far, I haven’t been asked to verify my age in the Spotify app when trying to access mature podcasts and music videos, but a handful of users on forums like Reddit who are well over the age of 18 have have already encountered the checks. Why have VPNs become so popular?
Spotify has explained in various community posts that it isn’t designed to work with VPNs, and you naturally shouldn’t use one to circumvent any age verification checks.
However, this hasn’t stopped free VPNs from dominating Apple’s UK App Store, as internet users look to find ways of protecting their data from future breaches, or perhaps even bypass those checks completely.
VPNs work by encrypting your internet traffic, but they’re not all equal – so it’s important to choose the right one for your needs. Free VPNs can log an excessive amount of data, which could ultimately put your privacy at risk, and sometimes lack important security features.
Can we start pushing for it to be illegal to expose children to religion?
This shit is ridiculous.
If you buy your music, say on Bandcamp Friday where Bandcamp waves their revenue, you could host your own streaming server, and eventually cancel your Spotify membership.
https://isitbandcampfriday.com/
https://github.com/navidrome/navidrome
There is also Qobuz as an alternative which pays the artist $. 01873 per stream, as opposed to Spotify’s $0.003 per stream. About 5x more. Plus you can buy the music from the platform if you want. And it has higher quality audio, family plans, gift cards.
I’ve recently gone back to outright buying my music (CDs mostly for me - I like having a hard copy), and tbh I find I’m actually enjoying the music more too.
Qobuz+navi has been my go to for a while. Sadly, a fair amount of music I listen to isn’t on Qobuz (or Bandcamp).
I never stopped downloading my favorite stuff. I pay for streaming, but I’m not trusting them to give me access forever.
People only threaten to leave but never actually do it because “muh recommendation algorithm”
Whats a good alternative? I tried last.fm for a while but didn’t like the suggestions.
Last.fm has been decent for me.
Also, believe it or not, Youtube. Just looking up the odd song once in a while has resulted in good stuff showing up on my home page pretty regularly.Navidrome and lidarr.
- Download all your Spotify playlists and listen history from their privacy page
- Download the full discography from all the artists with lidarr
- Listen to your new music with dynamic recommendations from your downloaded songs with Navidrome.
Download the full discography from all the artists with lidarr
Damn, that’s gonna be a looot of stuff
Do it, why don’t they do it??? Because they are cowards!
Same goes for Nintendo fans and Nintendo 2, and many other who finally caved.
I’m sick of all these people saying but do nothingThey live from us, not the opposite. We have the power.
I want to remind people something: you are using this decentralized and open source platform for free.
Spotify is shit but artists releasing their music there is not helping. There are plenty of musicians struggling to live off their career but these in top charts most people listen to are not poor, their are on spotify because it’s lucrative.
I want to support independent artists, not that Spotify gives them a fair share. My plan is to support artists where possible via Bandcamp or merch, but otherwise find a way to acquire music
wait to buy shit at shows instead of online. Bands make more directly from live March sales vs online.
Unfortunately, many of the artists I listen to don’t play near me often.
What? Interacting with people in live environments? In this economy?
small local bands have $20 or even free shows
Wow look at you affording to go to concerts.
No no no, just start torrenting. Streaming services shouldn’t exist. They rob you & then geo-block you
OK. Enlighten me. What’s a solid route to find underground bands from around the world that that isnt a streamer or bandcamp? Youre not gonna find underground shit with just torrents and torrenting only makes sure that bands dont ever make the money they need to continue. “They rob you…” Yeah and your robbing underground bands of funds they need to continue putting out mudic Its shitty but bandcamp has historically been good to underground bands in ways that no other site has considered. So please. Point me somewhere that i can find underground bands AND that pays on par with bandcamp.
You can just send them the money directly you know ?
Rip it from youtube. Yt-dlp works fine. You likely will have to compromise something but its possible.
I swear if they continue with this kinda shit, I’m gonna go from ‘fan’ to ‘disappointed paying customer’
paying
I see shit going everywhere. Why didn’t that disappoint you with youself first?
Disappoint me with myself? What have I done?
Respected a corporation.
Respect = bad ???
$hut the fcuk 🆙, yer fcoking moron (am I doing this right?)
For corporations? Yup. You got it.
You were. Then it got pointless and personal. Like you seemed to have understood and immediately swept the rug right under yourself like a cartoon.
I’d ask if the head you cracked needed help but I think you may have made the point already.
Besides, I tried that a few years ago and I don’t understand any of the attention the experience has generated such an obsessive and chronic repetition of consumption among the masses. I like thinking. Same thought of anything opiate to boot. A real WTF?
💀
It’s all about context and delusion today. There’s even a good rep of it by a Cyn song, Hardheaded.
I wonder how “bad” it really is for a kid to be exposed to nudity (and “worse”!), if actually at all or even the reverse.
Then Bam 18 years old, let’s look at beheading videos and 2 girls 1 cup no problemo?
If buying isn’t owning piracy isn’t stealing.
Usenet take my money.
Yarrrgh ho ho and a bottle of rum!
I haven’t sailed the seas in decades but when a fist tries to tightly hold the sand, the sand slips out more quickly.
Since when have there been age restrictions on music? Freedom of the arts, anyone?
Yeah, except Spotify isn’t just a music company. They’ve been trying for years to get you to use their App for other stuff that’s costs them less royalties.
So now Spotify includes all manners of audiobooks and shitty podcasts.
And while we all agree that age verification is bad… If anything ever deserves age verification, it may be Joe Rogan.
Tried Spotify years ago and found the sound quality abyssmal, the catalogue disappointing and the ads unbearable. Still can’t understand why people are wasting their time with that crap. OTOH people are using their smartphones and BT headphones as their primary source for music, so it doesn’t really matter what kind of noise they’re enjoying. Protip: Put your heads in the blender. Acoustuically equivalent, much cheaper and doesn’t make you half as stupid. Plus: wearing a blemder on your head might become the next big thing on TikTok.
Music was age restricted in the us forever. I got denied buying doggie style when I was younger
“Forever” can’t be. I got through all sorts of trouble buying beer in the US when I only had a European drivers’ license with me but not the slightest bit buying CDs in the 1990s. OTOH, that might depend on state or even be “self regulation” at work.
Honestly, I was probably too young for that album when it first came out. Listening to that album as a 40s year old man made me think why there was a age restriction.
“PARENTAL ADVISORY”, once a coveted badge even 😄
You wouldn’t censor art, right?! Right?!
Those who knows, knows …
If you’re in the US then it’s since Tipper Gore, wife of Al Gore, got a bug up her ass. You can find video of Dee Snyder, lead vocalists of the 80’s hair metal band Twisted Sister giving testimony before congress.
It was hilarious when Dee implied that maybe Tipper (Al Gores wife) was into BDSM because she was so up in arms about some lyrics. Al Gore looked like his head was gonna explode.
https://www.ranker.com/list/dee-snyder-speech-parents-music-resource-center/melissa-sartore
Bug up her ass? Is that a metaphor 😐?
It’s more of an idiom but yeah it’s not literal. It’s similar to “bee in one’s bonnet” but more crass/modern.
Dee Snyder gave an eloquent defense of free speech in that testimony.
2Live Crew provided a significantly less eloquent and significantly more awesome performance on Phil Donahue.
You have (perhaps unintentionally) self marked your account as a bot account. Because some people enable the filter to not see these comments you may want to undo that.
Interesting. I didn’t know that was possible.
I thought that setting allowed me to see bot accounts. Thanks for the tip.Under settings there should be one box for “show bot accounts” which sounds like what you wanted on and another called “bot account” which lets people self identify an account as a bot.
Thanks. I figured it out after I looked at it more closely.
I remember. Bur AFAIK that didn’t have much effect except some funny stickers on US imports. I’d have noticed if anything like age verification for music had been in place in Europe (incl. UK) because I used to go to record stores and buy actual records. I still was a minor during the better part of the 1980s and very much into metal so I’d certainly know.