• Tinidril@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    It’s accurate that their lawyer made that true argument. That’s just how party primaries work in the US, unfortunately. It’s not accurate that “the party went to court for the right to rig”. The whole point of the argument was to avoid a potentially long and expensive case from moving forward. The context matters, and the lawyer would have been incompetent not to bring it up, as would a Republican or even Green party lawyer in that situation.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      God damn, you’re hyperfixating on one part of my initial comment because you don’t like people remembering how awful your wing of the party constantly is to anyone but netanyahu and two cheneys.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          I know you scream “republican” at anyone who says the party should listen to the left for the first fucking time.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            Not everyone. Just you. And just for the record, the party should absolutely listen to the left for the first fucking time. You just aren’t the left. Even if you are left, your bad takes aren’t representative of the vast majority.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      That’s an overly charitable interpretation.

      What actually happened was that progressives sued the DNC for unfairly rigging the primaries, which they did.

      Rather than try to deny it, they went with the tactic of saying “well we’re allowed to because we own the process, not the voters”.

      This in spite of their own charter mandating that they stay neutral and not favor any candidate over others during the primary process.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        I don’t think the word “rigging” tells an accurate story. I do think they pulled strings to get all the establishment candidates to Voltron into Biden for super Tuesday. I do think they influenced their cohorts in the media to make Bernie look like he couldn’t win the general. I don’t believe they messed with the voting process itself, which is what “rigging” tends to invoke.

        Rather than try to deny it, they went with the tactic of saying

        Again, context matters. In a legal process there are different times to make different arguments, and a good lawyer makes use every argument available. This particular argument dealt with whether or not the court had jurisdiction in the matter, so it came early in the process.

        This in spite of their own charter mandating that they stay neutral

        What exactly does that mean? Is every member required to be personally neutral in even their personal relationships outside the DNC? Does that extend to Obama who is neither a board member or on staff at the DNC? Being neutral is a good idea, but that rule is pretty meaningless.

        To be clear, I am no apologist for the Democratic establishment. I blame them more for Trump than the Republicans. That’s why I want progressives to show up and vote them out in primaries. Giving the false impression that their vote won’t count is counterproductive.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          To be clear, I am no apologist for the Democratic establishment.

          To be clear, that’s the only thing you have ever been or ever will be.

          Giving the false impression that their vote won’t count is counterproductive.

          Pointing out that the party does everything it can to ratfuck progressives means that they might respond to pressure to stop, and you don’t want that.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            To be clear, that’s the only thing you have ever been or ever will be.

            Oh, fuck off. I’ve been brutal towards the establishment. I just want them beaten, and pretending elections are rigged is counterproductive to that end. You’re nothing but a right wing agitator.

            they might respond to pressure to stop

            Why would they? It’s apparently working. Now who is suddenly feeling charitable towards the establishment? You think they can be shamed into playing nice? You are so full of shit.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 days ago

              Oh, fuck off. I’ve been brutal towards the establishment.

              Yes, you brutally defend them every chance you get no matter what they do.

              You think they can be shamed into playing nice?

              Yeah, they’ll only change by unconditional enthusiastic support every time they betray anyone to your left.