• Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    No, this isn’t me feigning ignorance. There are much better uses of a person’s time if their goal is environmentalism than sitting in traffic.

    • Senal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Possibly , but that’s not what you said.

      The implication was that making cars idle was the point of blocking in the road, which is wasn’t/isn’t.

      How does <this thing that i know was not the point> <fulfil the goal i know is unrelated to the thing i just mentioned> ?

      A failure of sentence structure or purposeful trolling.

      • Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I will concede that I phrased that poorly. I realize that making cars idle was not the point, but that is was the result would be.

        • Senal@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          Fair enough.

          You realise that the fact you’re even talking about it means it’s doing more than just making cars idle.

          Now, whether it’s actually helping anything in a tangible way, that’s a different conversation entirely.