• Senal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Possibly , but that’s not what you said.

    The implication was that making cars idle was the point of blocking in the road, which is wasn’t/isn’t.

    How does <this thing that i know was not the point> <fulfil the goal i know is unrelated to the thing i just mentioned> ?

    A failure of sentence structure or purposeful trolling.

    • Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I will concede that I phrased that poorly. I realize that making cars idle was not the point, but that is was the result would be.

      • Senal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Fair enough.

        You realise that the fact you’re even talking about it means it’s doing more than just making cars idle.

        Now, whether it’s actually helping anything in a tangible way, that’s a different conversation entirely.