• CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    It doesn’t make sense because none of the other corporate employees are going to be there with him meaning it’s no different than if he (or they) just worked from home to begin with. It’s essentially the same as if they turned his home garage into an “office.”

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        That doesn’t really make sense because they’re still spending that money. A $1M/yr business expense on a new office that gives you a $1M/yr tax deduction isn’t putting you ahead financially.

        What you’re missing from the “no deduction” side is that they’re also not spending additional money on new offices.

          • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Wouldn’t that be a business expense as well? I agree it’s the more sane option, but they’re both still insanely hypocritical options when compared to allowing remote work.

            • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              Yeah, it is. But if the CEO has a home office he doesn’t get a deduction.

              Honestly I’m amazed he didn’t buy the office and lease it back to the company. That sounds like the sort of sleaze I expect from the C-suite

              • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                I just now realized you’re referring to a personal deduction for a home office and not a corporate deduction for the home office. I see what you’re getting at now and wouldn’t be surprised if that were the case.