“Low power consumption” in absolute numbers is not quite the same thing as “energy efficiency” for a server. Desktop CPUs are more useful for servers and - depending on the architecture - cheaper per W.
rhabarba
Runterwählen ist kein Gegenargument.
[Verifying my cryptographic key: openpgp4fpr:941D456ED3A38A3B1DBEAB2BC8A2CCD4F1AE5C21]
- 0 Posts
- 16 Comments
Yes, especially since they don’t have a display.
A laptop is a waste for servers. Too much energy consumption in my opinion.
Let’s save yourself some time. https://github.com/toolleeo/awesome-cli-apps-in-a-csv
rhabarba@feddit.orgto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•introducing copyparty, the FOSS file serverEnglish7·11 days agoAlso, it’s like Wordpress, growing new slow features you’ll never need with each new release.
rhabarba@feddit.orgto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•introducing copyparty, the FOSS file serverEnglish6·11 days agoI replaced nextCloud’s file sharing with Syncthing just recently, as I found myself only synchronising between two computers (one desktop, one smartphone) anyway. :-)
rhabarba@feddit.orgto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•introducing copyparty, the FOSS file serverEnglish2·11 days agoI don’t think there is a Python 2 version for retro equipment (DOS?). ;-)
rhabarba@feddit.orgto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•introducing copyparty, the FOSS file serverEnglish6·11 days agoFirefox isn’t that great for FTP either. Gopher still exists :-) and I’d love to use it even more.
rhabarba@feddit.orgto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•introducing copyparty, the FOSS file serverEnglish8·11 days agoCan we have Gopher support?
rhabarba@feddit.orgto Linux@lemmy.ml•Best os choices and use cases for a netbook with 2ram?0·12 days agoI’m still trying to find a decently low-spec machine to run WfW 3.11 on, so, as you mentioned retro gaming, that might be an alternative.
rhabarba@feddit.orgto Linux@lemmy.ml•Please, FOSS world, we need something like ChromeOS0·15 days agoThat’s already very inappropriate for non-technical users.
There is no operating system in existence that provides every single software you could imagine as a precompiled package for your platform right out of the box.
Also not appropriate.
You do have a point here. I, personally, don’t have a Bluetooth device at home, so YMMV, I guess.
rhabarba@feddit.orgto Linux@lemmy.ml•Please, FOSS world, we need something like ChromeOS0·15 days agoIs it difficult to break
Well, it won’t forbid you
rm -rf /
. But generally, it is very reliable.Is it easy to install software?
Yes, and there is quite a huge selection available from the official repositories (and you can compile most software “missing” there yourself).
Does it include support for a variety of hardware OOTB?
It depends on the hardware, but generally speaking, OpenBSD supports a nice amount of platforms and tries to keep “old” hardware alive as long as possible (for example, VAX support was dropped in 2016, which was quite some time after they were en vogue). What isn’t supported, however, is Bluetooth which was removed in OpenBSD 5.6 unless you use a dongle.
rhabarba@feddit.orgto Linux@lemmy.ml•Please, FOSS world, we need something like ChromeOS0·15 days agoIt is.
rhabarba@feddit.orgto Linux@lemmy.ml•Please, FOSS world, we need something like ChromeOS0·16 days agoThe End of Windows 10 is looming. The world needs a simpler, easy, quick, snackable alternative
OpenBSD exists.
That said, this article remains true.
rhabarba@feddit.orgto Linux@lemmy.ml•Fedora's FESCo To Decide Whether To Replace Upstream X.Org Server With XLibre Fork0·1 month agoNot as long as possible replacements aren’t platform-independent.
I noticed that my link collector nears perfection (for my use case) - not much stuff required to be done lately. Which is a good thing.