snooggums

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law

Why are they capitulating though?

Some of them drowned, some of them lived to tell the tale. That is why we have reports that they were threatened.

It is hard to find evidence of verbal threats when you ignore the claims made by the people being verbally threatened.

So, this is where the researchers are acknowledging that they are choking on the smell of their own farts.

However, there are still a lot of questions about how these advanced models are actually working. Some research has suggested that reasoning models may even be misleading users through their chain-of-thought processes.

Bull fucking shit. Making something complex enough to be unpredictable doesn’t mean it is intentional. Reasoning models are not reasoning, they are outputting something that looks like reasoning. There is no intent behind it to mislead or do anything on purpose. It just looks that way because the output is in a format that looks like a person writing down their thoughts.

This comic came out before Juicy?

Yup!

Wanting closure is a preference and does not apply to all games. Counter Strike 2 doesn’t have a story and there is zero closure for example.

The industry trying to force games into a live service model when they shouldn’t be is a problem, sure. There are a few games where the model actually is a benefit though, like Helldivers 2. Other than wrapping up things somehow while winding down the game there isn’t an opportunity for closure while an endless war is going on. The setting itself is why closure isn’t on the table.

So I agree with the overall idea as it applies to games in general, but it isn’t some universal truth.

Yes, requiring people to be civil when discussing topics that negatively impact them directly stifles the ability to convey how much they are suffering. Being forced to be polite to oppressors is absolutely awful.

So one thing that is an inherent issue with the distributed structure is inconsistent rules. There are instance rules and community rules and similar communities on different instances don’t have the same server or community rules, and a feed like All or even Subscribed is listing a bunch of things with different rules for interaction and adding a requirement to know all the rules for each individual post is unrealistic. Sure, most comments are fine if someone isn’t a complete jackass, but that mostly means the rules are not relevant the majority of the time.

Did you read and understand both the instance and community rules before commenting here? I did not, and have no regrets.

They paid for their expertise, even offering a bonus that was clearly less than whatever their projected profit would be, and then tried to squander it because they didn’t listen to their expertise.

Publishers in all kinds of industries are risk adverse to the point of not trusting whoever they made deals with to follow through. This is totally on brand for publishers!

One developer at a separate company who played Subnautica 2 and requested anonymity because they signed a non-disclosure agreement told Bloomberg they enjoyed the game and that it “seemed way more robust” than other titles in early access.

Yeah, this is clearly the publisher trying to get out of paying the full bonus.

She will continue to vote Republican though, which is what matters since Trump can’t run again anyway.

Doing the Lord’s work!

No, they should have zero say because they have weaseled themselves into a position that is the equivalent of a utility or whatever ISP are classified as. Their only involvement is whether they complete transactions between parties in a legal way.

“Do an extra step every single time you do anything.”

That is literally the success story of nearly every single billionaire.

Starting with wealth also gives more opportunities to get lucky.

The article says sexual content.

“It looks like this feature was added 5 years ago.”

If asking for confirmation, just ask for confirmation.

People before facebook thought critically of what they saw on the news as much as they do facebook today.

Sure, people didn’t think about things too much at any point in time and sources aren’t always perfectly reliable, but some sources are worse than others,