

not quite – it’s if you’re using 3.5x more electricity than average. Still seems fucked up from my lemmy-eye view though.
polite leftists make more leftists
more leftists make revolution
not quite – it’s if you’re using 3.5x more electricity than average. Still seems fucked up from my lemmy-eye view though.
probably faster to create and gets more views
it took me a while to understand that the guinea pig(?) in the window is meant to be the reflection of the one outside. Because the surface is roughly parallel with the viewer, the one outside is pointing to the left, so the flipped pig should also be pointing left.
Thanks for this one, a really valuable find:
You got a problem with open source? In /c/opensource?
I wrote a script called please
. You input please
followed by any other command (e.g. please git clone
, please wget blahblah
) and a robotic voice will say “affirmative,” then the command will run, and when it completes, the robotic voice reads out the exit code (e.g. “completed successfully” or “failed with status 1” etc.)
This is useful for when you have a command that takes a long time and you want to be alerted when it’s finished. And it’s a gentleman.
Hmm, that is a pretty insightful point. On the other hand, I think most people I know who are religious are the sort who can appreciate self-deprecating humour themselves – they might think it’s funny for taking an absurd premise to its logical conclusion.
What suggests to me that this author is trying to paint atheism in a negative light is quite straightforwardly “score one for atheism.” It doesn’t really have a hint of irony to me. I think the author clearly thinks atheism just isn’t cool anymore.
I didn’t catch the self-deprecation. What makes it clear?
a bit strange but I don’t really see the problem tbh. Are these references I’m not getting? I recognize joker and thanos.
Parents should be responsible for their kids’ internet usage.