My username is a wordplay on the Linux command filesystem check: fsck.

  • 1 Post
  • 16 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: February 24th, 2024

help-circle
  • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.worldtoFediverse@lemmy.worldI love Lemmy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    The interpretation of those two jumping in to be rude as hell is not exclusive from acknowledging disagreements in the past. Particularly in that is already implied with my original comment there as I referenced my experience.

    There was absolutely no reason for those two to act that way there, even if their intention was to attempt to point out that they think I was in the wrong in the previous encounters. “I think you were the one in the wrong at those times you’re referring to.” Or something along those lines accomplishes the same goal without being an asshole or making clearly false claims.

    Ironically, their choice to be such assholes in that circumstance adds quite a bit of evidence that the dbzer0 people were the ones in the wrong.

    – Edit –
    Actually, your links provide proof of the lies as well. That was when I blocked the dbzer0 instance, as I mentioned in those threads, and that was 3 months ago. So, how could I have been “constantly trolling in [dbzer0’s] comms” as Flatworm/Unruffled claimed? That’s exactly the kind of shit that I’m talking about. These admins, as well as some mods and users, are willing to straight up lie. And since they are admins, users have a tendency to just believe them and not even bother looking into things themselves.

    Edit: I don’t care about pro or anti-AI, but this seems to be the new division point around her

    I thought the division point was zero? lol.
    Should it be lemmy.dba1.com now?


  • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.worldtoFediverse@lemmy.worldI love Lemmy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    What other interpretation could there even be?

    My comment made no claims regarding the user from the main post or actions against them, it was only in regard to the claim about db0. That’s why I explained that the only context has to do with that first comment thread.

    I was not rude at all, just that I disagreed. Why does that mean it’s okay for those two to jump in to rudely make false claims?






  • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.worldtoFediverse@lemmy.worldI love Lemmy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    It’s more than a few. It’s several admins, a handful of their followers, nearly an entire instance’s users (even after blocking it), prolific posters that mod dozens of comms and people will rally behind them regardless of how much of an asshole they are being to you, and even one user in particular that was banned but is now hiding under a new account.

    It’s also partly how the platform works which feeds the most toxic users. It’s how the platform seems to entice people into stricter tribalistic behavior than other platforms. Say anything that might be construed as negative towards one of the many things these groups base their entire identity on and you get swarmed by them and you can’t even defend yourself. You get downvoted to hell and they get upvoted for being assholes by their other cult-like followers. Not that votes “matter”, but it just makes it feel shitty when someone decides to be an asshole to you and they get supported for it while trying to defend yourself only gets more people against you.

    There’s more, but trying to describe it all is making me feel worse.

    This place sucks. It’s absolutely awful that I feel this is actually true, but reddit was better than this.










  • I believe that as it currently stands, AI is too closely tied to big corporations, especially for the average person. So, without specifically including the caveat of “this thing was generated using an open source, locally run model” or something along those lines, it’s reasonable to assume it was generated by using big corp-run AI giving them more data and power over the individuals. I also think giving too much credence to AI gives the big techbro AI bubble more value and power. Additionally, AI makes it exceedingly easy for low-quality or nefarious content to proliferate and effectively choke-out thoughtful content, similar to how misinformation/disinformation takes over factual information. Like I mentioned, I agree that ‘AI is just a tool’, but that doesn’t exclude it from being extremely frequently abused, which then puts a sour taste in my mouth. I could go on for why I tend to dislike AI in general while acknowledging what possible benefits there may be for it. None of my reasoning is founded on any of the claims db0 users were trying to force onto me.

    According to your fellow admin and other very loud and rude users from db0 (whose behaviors have been validated by the same admin), that makes me a “right-wing neoliberal”. Instead of engaging in a discussion about it, those people instead berated me and kept pushing the same idea.

    /–edit–/

    To add to this, I think a big contention point is that there is no rule against stating that you don’t like AI or reasons to dislike AI, but the user’s hostility were a reaction as if that were the case. If there were an instance or community rule for that, then these reactions would be understandable (though, still an overreaction IMO).