Presumably the devs have to agree to it. I dont think gog cn just decide “were going to give away this game we dont own for free”
Womble
- 0 Posts
- 4 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
Cake day: July 10th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Womble@piefed.worldto Games@lemmy.world•GOG’s Freedom To Buy Campaign Gives Away Controversial Games For Free To Protest CensorshipEnglish0·8 days agoThats pretty funny given the current “save the children” censorship in the uk that is going on.
Womble@piefed.worldto Programming@programming.dev•We Asked 100+ AI Models to Write Code. The Results: AI-generated Code That Works, But Isn’t SafeEnglish0·8 days agoI find that very difficult to believe. If for no other reason that there is an implementation in the wiki page for Levenshtein distance (and wiki is known to be very prominant in the training sets used for foundational models), and that trying it just now and it gave a perfectly functional implementation.
Yes, i find it difficult to believe that they mess up a dozen line algo that is in their training set in a prominant place with no complicating factors. Despite what a lot of people here think, LLMs do have value for coding. Even if the companies selling them make ridiculous claims about what they can do.