

Well that a big question, involving philosophy, economics, politics, and the law. The answer can range from “It’s complicated”, to “nobody”.
Well that a big question, involving philosophy, economics, politics, and the law. The answer can range from “It’s complicated”, to “nobody”.
On the ground
This is a city
They do text prediction based on the training data. If the training data is all encrypted gibberish, it’ll only output gibberish.
That’s not how LLMs work.
Having an AI isn’t problematic at all; Forcing it into places where people don’t want it is.
And the CEO being pro Rump is a stretch. He approved of one Rump policy. Hell I hate the man and believe him a cancer to the world, but even I can point to a couple things I like he did.
One deserved murder, for one undeserved.
Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
Only if they don’t settle out of court.
I can’t imagine trump wants this to go to a court room.
That would be a philosophical point of view, being “Might Makes Right”.
Also, “The State” as you’re using it, is a term generically referring to any government. Not related to the individual states in the United States. In fact in the US specifically, the federal government “owns” the land, and gives it to each State. For modern context see how Nevada only controls a fraction of “their” land. In fact they’ve sued the federal government about it.