And question 12, looks like the intent was below circle 3, but they put below circle 2. So is it a typo, or another intentionally ambiguous question where you can fail whoever you want?

One more reason RFC3339 is better than ISO8601?

In all honesty, the big problem with Julian dates are they aren’t readable for most people, if they even recognize what they are. In specific industries, it’s an acceptable format, with minimal ambiguity. Now, do we talk about how my company puts the year after the date?

Julian dates suck, but not as much as the standard date formats.

“Would the authoritarian just tell me what to do with no consideration of my preferences?”

So, if I said “I’d like a burger, but not too much ketchup or mustard,” would you put a little mustard on it, or no mustard at all? When I see “no excessive capitalization or grammatical errors”, I assume they don’t want excessive amounts of either, while you’re saying they don’t want excessive capitalization and no grammatical errors at all. Seems an odd interpretation, linguistically.