

By “misinformation” you mean Dinah Project or some other kind of Israeli propaganda? I just call these “*** (censured by mods) *** lies” but each to his own.
By misinformation you are referring to Dinah project and any other Israeli propaganda, yes? I usually just call these “fucking lies” but each to his own.
The UN, however, has stated multiple times that it does not have evidence of systematic sexual abuse by Hamas or any other militant group on October 7, 2023. A top United Nations official issued a statement last week that stands in direct contradiction to the new Israeli report.
Oh…
She doesn’t have civil rights anymore after she was killed so technically true. /s
Edit:
I just read it and it seems it may be another cop who shot her?
The Justice Department’s sentencing memo for Hankison downplayed his role in the raid at Taylor’s home, saying he “did not shoot Ms. Taylor and is not otherwise responsible for her death.”
The issue with judicial review is focus on process rather than on merit.
Fucking war criminals.
At this point I can only quote Walther White:
“Is this just a genetic thing with you? Is it congenital? Did your, did your mother drop you on your head when you were a baby?”
Everything which starts with “Israel says” is inevitably followed by a lie.
Now try to understand what you are reading. Start with
Completely banning personal relationships at work would likely breach an employee’s right to a private life
Disclosure - yes. That can be requested and an employee may be sacked if he fails to disclose such information. Unlike USA however, companies are unable to tell an employee to NOT have a relationship with someone at work. It can make a decision to move employees in relationship to other teams if for example there is a risk involved.
Read. Again. Slowly. 🤦
You should just stop embarrassing yourself.
Are you a teenager? 🙄
So which side would we chose ?
Yeah, perfect mod 🙄
You are such a pussy 🙄
Are you a mod here by any chance? Don’t like criticism?
Or you could make an effort of posting links to actual articles instead of YouTube links for functionally illiterate?
I gave you a link to solicitors dealing with these, you fucking muppet.
It is YOU moronically claiming, despite giving facts, that one can be sacked for having a relationship (rather than not disclosing it). Onus of proof is on you - show me ONE case from an employment tribunal where the court sided with an employer in such scenario.
Read again. You cannot be sacked for having a relationship and companies are not allowed to forbid that. Admit you were wrong and move on.