This is very exciting. Here is the APK I downloaded. And the associated discussion.

It even already seems to support stylus input which is very exciting seeing as there has been talk of porting RNote to Android.

  • Yeah, tarpits. Or, even just intentionally fractionally lagging the connection, or putting a delay on the response to some mime types. Delays don’t consume nearly as much processing as PoW. Personally, I like tar pits that trickle out content like a really slow server. Hidden URLs that users are not likely to click on. These are about the least energy-demanding solutions that have a chance of fooling bots; a true, no-response tarpit would use less energy, but is easily detected by bots and terminated.

    Proof of work is just a terrible idea, once you’ve accepted that PoW is bad for the environment, which it demonstrably is.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Tar pits rely on crawlers being dumb. That isn’t necessarily the case with a lot of stuff on the internet. It isn’t uncommon for a not to render a page and then only process the visible stuff.

      Also I’ve yet to see any evidence that Arubis is any worse for the environment than any basic computer function.

    • solardirus@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Tarpits suck. Not worth the implementation or overhead. Instead the better strat is to pretend the server is down with a 503 code or that the url is onvalid with a 404 code so the bots stop clinging to your content.

      Also we already have non-PoW captchas that dont require javascript. See: go-away for these implemwntations

      • There is negligible server overhead for a tarpit. It can be merely a script that listens on a socket and never replies, or it can reply with markov-generated html with a few characters a second, taking minutes to load a full page. This has almost no overhead. Implementation is adding a link to your page headers and running the script. It’s not exactly rocket science.

        Which part of that is overhead, or difficult?

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      None of those things work well is the problem. It doesn’t stop the bots from hammering you site. Crawlers will just timeout and move on.

    • Jade@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I run a service that gets attacked by AI bots, and while PoW isn’t the only way to do things, none of your suggestions work at all.