The group responsible is “Collective Shout”, the same org has targeted Steam before.

There are calls on social media now to contact Mastercard, Visa and co. and file complaints.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Nearly every cryptocurrency (aside from like Monero), is a literal open, transparent ledger that anyone can (and do) view and analyze.

        It’s not anonymous at all.

        • hisao@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Look, when you use some platform with KYC, they indeed can tie that id information you give them to your internal addresses you use on the same platform. But the moment you send it to your external wallet that link is lost. They can see the transaction but they don’t know and can’t check if that destination address belongs to you, or it’s a person who sold you something, or it’s your friend/relative, or someone you donated to, etc.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            This is naive and incorrect. There is a reason why darknet markets these days only deal in Monero, for the most part.

            I’m not saying it’s trivial, but there are literally corporations dedicated to analyzing block chains for law enforcement. It’s an entire industry.

            • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              yes, even without KYC, one opsec fail and they can get quite a info on you, things like usage patterns and eventually potentially a profile, upon which will probablycreate a “credit score” of sorts and probably sell advertising data too because why not!?

      • ipitco@lemmybefree.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Except Monero and a few exceptions, AML and KYC checks are everywhere. Tainted coins and shit.

        Crypto goes somewhere that they don’t like? Crypto is seized when it reaches an exchange and they ask for ID and source of funds

        • hisao@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Crypto goes somewhere that they don’t like? Crypto is seized when it reaches an exchange and they ask for ID and source of funds

          I don’t understand. Lets say I have a normal bank card, I paid taxes for all the money I got there. Sometimes I buy crypto using p2p on some platform using this card. I trade this crypto with some other crypto on the same platform. Periodically I send crypto to my personal wallet from there. From my personal wallet I buy porn games for example. At which point someone comes in and seizes anything?

          • ipitco@lemmybefree.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            They would not, but you would not be anonymous this way. You get problems when:

            • The crypto you received is through a shady source (it could be any individual which pays you with dirty coins)
            • You engaged in pro-privacy activity, which links you with illegal activity, like coin mixers to blur the origin and destination of crypto
            • You received more crypto than you bought

            As long as you stay with centralized exchanges and directly send crypto to some websites, you should in theory always be fine (as long as you don’t send them to criminal or pro-privacy services), but that’s not the original goal of crypto

            Apart from that, some countries straight up force you to declare every transaction you make with crypto, which isn’t doable for most people and puts them in illegality

            • hisao@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              You don’t have to send crypto from exchange directly to websites. You can send it to your external wallet (outside of any platform), and spend from there. And no one’s ever going to be able to prove that wallet belongs to you.

                • hisao@ani.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  No, they don’t know who that wallet belongs to and even though they may hypothesize its yours they don’t have any way to prove it. Moreover, anyone, including sellers can use unlimited amount of wallets and register them at rate 1000x faster than even the advanced CIA group would be able to tie even a single address to a particular person/company. So if Steam operated in crypto, it would take days/weeks of some of the most advanced feds in the world to try to prove that you bought something from Steam using your crypto. And they might even fail at that if you or Steam’s wallet are handled carefully, and they wouldn’t even know what exactly you bought.

                  • ipitco@lemmybefree.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    Following crypto trails is easy when there’s only one destination…

                    You’re putting too much trust in the system. If there’s a doubt you will be asked to clear it, they won’t do it for you