• evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I auto-translated the Korean article on this because it has more detail.

    https://n.news.naver.com/article/015/0005180971?sid=101

    Sounds like the majority of people picked up were in fact Korean citizens working under false pretenses. They used b1 visas and ESTA (non-visa travel authorization) meant for things like personal travel or international meetings, but not productive work like constructing a new facility.

    The fact that they were Korean insinuates that they weren’t doing run-of-the-mill construction tasks because that could be handled by local firms (who would probably be hiring local Latino workers): they were probably there for much more technical work.

    Hyundai would have known this, and would have been intentionally breaking this law. This sounds to me a lot more like a big company actually getting consequences than what ice has been doing raiding small businesses and home depot parking lots.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      were in fact Korean citizens working under false pretenses. They used b1 visas and ESTA (non-visa travel authorization) meant for things like personal travel or international meetings, but not productive work like constructing a new facility.

      Do you happen to know for certain that b1 visas and ESTA does not cover “productive work like constructing a new facility”? Because I think you are wrong. (I am not an immigration lawyer, but I suspect you are not either).

      I have worked for international companies, and got sent over for “productive work” in visa waiver countries, and nobody told me that I needed a visa for any of that. The main focus of immigration law is on making sure people are authorized to take a job in the US. If someone is employed outside the US and comes to the US on behalf of their employer, and not paid for their services by any US entity, then it doesn’t matter what they do, as long as they leave when they are supposed to.

      And, in fact, with a casual Google search, I found that a B1 visa does not in fact prohibit those activities: https://www.boundless.com/immigration-resources/b-1-b-2-visitor-visa-explained. It explicitly allows them, for a short duration (but longer than the ETSA waiver would). That link also explicitly says Canadians do not need the B1 visa for short activities, because it is covered under the visa waivers. My guess is it would work the same for any country eligible for the ESTA.

      In spite of all this, ICE detained them anyway, because rules don’t apply to them. They get to do whatever the hell they want, because the President hates foreigners. It’s that simple.

      • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Im definitely not a lawyer, but here is a government link.

        https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/tourism-visit/visitor.html

        Permitted activities under b1 include

        • Consult with business associates
        • Attend a scientific, educational, professional, or business convention or conference
        • Settle an estate
        • Negotiate a contract

        Not permitted include:

        • Study
        • Employment
        • Paid performances, or any professional performance before a paying audience
        • Arrival as a crewmember on a ship or aircraft
        • Work as foreign press, in radio, film, print journalism, or other information media
        • Permanent residence in the United States

        Also on that official site, it says the permitted activities for visa-free (ESTA) are the same as B visas.

        If someone is employed outside the US and comes to the US on behalf of their employer, and not paid for their services by any US entity, then it doesn’t matter what they do, as long as they leave when they are supposed to.

        The US government actually doesn’t care who is paying for the work, what matters is if the work is taking place within the US, it requires a proper visa (or esta).

        • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Consult with business associates

          Overseeing the construction of a facility and training of staff would be covered.

          This is a reminder that no company or nation should trust the US or invest in the US. International boycott, global embargo. It’s the only way.