• 0x0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    they need to ask for higher prices of the products they sell to still make a profit.

    That’s bullshit, they’d make a profit anyway, but it would be less of a profit, the poor souls… and they’d still hike prices anyway.

    • ebolapie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      They have a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholder and therefore will act in a way that maximizes profits. It’s just what they do as a consequence of what they are. In candyland this leads to overproduction as companies race for existing markets and seek to penetrate new ones, and as a consequence they end up making a hell of a lot more than what they need, which leads to better access and lower prices for the consumer. In the real world… The classic example of something capitalism is really good at making is a pencil, and you have to hand it to them. Pencils are in fact cheap as hell and very readily available. Food, shelter, and medicine, on the other hand…

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        I really want to see a change to that fundamental shareholder law, that allows for things like:
        A) A company is structured around a particular mission, which may have nothing to do with money in particular, just set up as a “shared goal”
        B) Any profit motivations must acknowledge both short-term and long-term. If a company wants to replace their flour with sawdust, then a board member can readily explain this will likely lead to a long-term dropoff in customers and that such an action should be legally barred.