I can understand why governments would push for something like this after 9/11, though it of course goes without saying that this is a totally unacceptable violation of someone’s basic rights. It also goes without saying that governments always want more control over their citizens, but what exactly are they so worried might happen, right now, in 2025 or the near future?

  • ell1e@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    For those here who didn’t know specifics, as far as I know the EU has announced in July 2025 guidelines, set to come into effect until 2026, that seem to basically be the same as the UK online safety act:

    https://www.eunews.it/en/2025/07/14/the-eu-launches-an-online-age-verification-app-pilot-project-in-five-member-states-including-italy/

    https://www.mlex.com/mlex/articles/2368265/online-services-get-up-to-12-months-to-apply-age-verification-eu-guidelines-say

    https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/118226

    These guidelines say, among other things, check the last link: “Where the provider of the online platform has identified medium risks to minors on their platform as established in its risk review […] and those risks cannot be mitigated by less restrictive measures. The Commission considers this will be the case where the risk is not high enough to require access restriction based on age verification but not low enough that it would be appropriate to not have any access restriction […]” And “Self-declaration is not considered to be an appropriate age-assurance measure as further explained below.”

    If you don’t want the Online Safety Act in the EU, call or e-mail your representative now. As far as I can tell, this is already in place. The clock is ticking.

  • ClownFiesta@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Centralization tends be self-reinforcing. Social unrest might cause the public to demand more safety measures, which usually come at the expense of freedoms. I’d also wager that the lower the level of trust in government is, the more they want to impose control and authority.

    And in the EU specifically it is because lobbyists have been working overtime to try and pass chat control: https://borncity.com/win/2023/09/27/european-union-which-lobby-organizations-are-behind-the-plans-for-chat-control/

  • Ildsaye [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Another factor is the tendency of the rate of profit to fall. Late capitalism has to keep finding more and more shameless ways to squeeze regular people as the easy money recedes. Lobbyists are pushing harder to lock people into a few big services and subscriptions so they are forced to yield more personal data and spending money.

  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I feel it’s the same vibe with return to office policy in Canada.

    These things seem like they come from absolutely no where with no legitimate reason and then all of these executives are on board making it happen.

    Like what the fuck is going on

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      If you’re talking about Toronto and Ottawa, as far as I heard, a huge part of the reason is Downtown businesses are struggling now that way fewer people are commuting Downtown.

      But the solution to this is not RTO. If your DOWNTOWN of all places isn’t self sufficient I don’t know what to tell you other than your municipal policies are failing. Just let people live in the office buildings. “Oh they’re too wide and you’ll have to make the units narrow strips that only have a tiny sliver of window on one side” Do that then. Tons of people would still live in those because Downtown should be the most desirable place to live.

  • SexUnderSocialism [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The genocide in Gaza and the massive response against it made them realize that they no longer had the ability to control the narrative despite their best efforts to spread Zionist propaganda. The so called “free world” has always relied on being able to sway public opinion and manufacture consent through media when necessary. Now that it’s stopped working because of people’s access to media on the internet that counters their efforts, they decided it’s time to push a more restrictive regime in order to deal with the issue.

    • strung6387@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The countries under discussion are democratic republics, aren’t they? If so, then age verification is what the people voted for, not an insidious plot by “they”.

      • I_Voxgaard [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 hours ago

        are you antisemitism concern trolling or new?

        Even if our elections were “democratic” (they aren’t), there is absolutely no chance of voting this shit away before it is foisted onto the population.

      • the rizzler@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        the people get a choice between a few candidates, all of whom are preapproved in the major parties by the donors, who aren’t really of “the people” in any meaningful sense of the word

  • NotKyloRen@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It’s a coordinated play, that’s why. Their hope and plan is that VPNs become worthless because you’re gonna be VPNing into censored countries anyway. They won’t want anonymity/pseudo-anonymity like we’ve had.

  • pathos@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It’s due to Palantir and co, lobbying various European governments in recent years. Look at which EU governments are Palantir’s clients.

  • Soot [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    As a European, it’s been a long time coming. I would say tide turned in favour of it and both Ukraine and Israel-Gaza have been important factors - Most countries suddenly decided they didn’t have enough sway over public support for Western imperialism. And the big part of that has been the internet.

  • Gravitywell@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It’s nothing new, They try to pull some bullshit at least once every decade. In the USA it was the Clipper Chip in the 90s where they said “trust the government with a backdoor” and then it got cracked and they tried very hard to prosecute one of the inventors of PGP… in the 2010s it was SOPA and other bills they tried to pass.

  • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    A lot of good points here, but I’d also like to bring forward another hypothesis which partially explain the incredible speed at which this is moving forward in the last few months (even though things have been brewing back and forth for years, decades).

    The US has become a hostile state. For Five Eyes, Six Eyed, Nine Eyes, and Forty Yes that means much less domestic intel since all the Eyes were sharing domestic intelligence to circumvent stronger protections on their own citizens. Canada would spy for the US and the UK, and vice versa, which was a neat way of getting rid of pesky rights afforded to citizens.