I don’t care if openai lose all their money but this ruling would also effect open source AI.
If somebody releases a AI why would they be liable for how people decide to use it? Its software and like any other program its the user’s choice on how to use it.
If i decide to run rm / --no-preserve-root is gnu then responsible to fix it?
AI is already very censored, and if makers become liable for what people do with their AI they will become hyper censored and performance will go down the drain.
Don’t known don’t really care. A child is dead this isnt a “won’t somebody please think of the children” thing, multiple people have had complete mental breakdowns and will never be the same.
I don’t care if openai lose all their money but this ruling would also effect open source AI.
If somebody releases a AI why would they be liable for how people decide to use it? Its software and like any other program its the user’s choice on how to use it.
If i decide to run rm / --no-preserve-root is gnu then responsible to fix it?
AI is already very censored, and if makers become liable for what people do with their AI they will become hyper censored and performance will go down the drain.
Don’t known don’t really care. A child is dead this isnt a “won’t somebody please think of the children” thing, multiple people have had complete mental breakdowns and will never be the same.