• CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Its not supposition. Democrats stated they would return before the initial special session even ended.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2025/08/14/texas-redistricting-walkout-ending-00509750

    A statement from the state House Democratic Caucus said that the lawmakers will return on two conditions, both of which are expected this week. First, that the Texas Legislature ends its first special session on Friday, and second that California lawmakers introduce their expected proposal that could offset the GOP gains in Texas.

    Democrats weren’t interested in blocking gerrymandering. They were only interested in engaging in their own gerrymandering at the expense of the nation when combined with Republican efforts. These two private organizations win and we all lose.

    Even if you argue that Dem gerrymandering is an advantage, Texas Dems could have still blocked the effort there while California Dems gerrymandered their own state. Can you answer what was gained by Texas Dems allowing this vote to go through?

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      The statement you quote says their condition was the session ends. They did not have the numbers to stop a vote that is why they did the quorum trick to begin with. I don’t think you understand the situation at all.

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        The quote says their conditions are that the first special session ends on a particular day and that California Dems announce their plan to gerrymander their state.

        They absolutely did have the numbers to stop the vote which is exactly why there was no quorum and why Republicans couldn’t pass the bill with them gone. I understand the situation perfectly. Considering you misread the quoted text and believe they had no power to prevent a vote, I think it is you that doesnt understand the situation.