So a new major version of Debian has been released, and now I see a lot of complaints about various issues stemming from an upgrade. I do not remember this many after an LTS Ubuntu version. I don’t want to rush to conclusions like “Ubuntu has money for better quality assurance”. I can easily come up with explanations for why these statistics can be skewed, like “Ubuntu-loving plebeians do not come to complain to elite Lemmy users about their puny problems”. I’m curious what you think?
That’s utter BS, money does not equal quality.
I just borked an Ubuntu Noble installation by running
apt upgrade
on it. Yeah it’s ZFS-based, why didn’t Canonical ensure the upgrade would be smooth?Of course it was tongue-in-cheek, I hope you didn’t take the “elite Lemmy users” seriously ;)
While personal stories could be enlightening, I’m more curious about the statistics