So a new major version of Debian has been released, and now I see a lot of complaints about various issues stemming from an upgrade. I do not remember this many after an LTS Ubuntu version. I don’t want to rush to conclusions like “Ubuntu has money for better quality assurance”. I can easily come up with explanations for why these statistics can be skewed, like “Ubuntu-loving plebeians do not come to complain to elite Lemmy users about their puny problems”. I’m curious what you think?

  • 0x0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Ubuntu has money for better quality assurance”

    That’s utter BS, money does not equal quality.
    I just borked an Ubuntu Noble installation by running apt upgrade on it. Yeah it’s ZFS-based, why didn’t Canonical ensure the upgrade would be smooth?

    • arty@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Of course it was tongue-in-cheek, I hope you didn’t take the “elite Lemmy users” seriously ;)

      While personal stories could be enlightening, I’m more curious about the statistics