Being pushed for a technologically illiterate ex headteacher as usual.

  • Trihilis@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Well this was 100% to be expected. Banning VPNs is next, then TOR and before you know it you have to scan your ID to even access the internet.

    Say goodbye to the “free” internet. Say hello to Orwellian “state approved” internet.

        • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          And what about all the companies that use VPNs? Do they just shut down because the government made them illegal?

          One thing I know about my country is that companies rule what happens and so this would never happen.

          If you don’t believe me, then feel free to educate me on how you would do this and countries that have already succeeded.

          Furthermore you can disguise VpN traffic as regular old HTTPs traffic.

          • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            illegal

            What’s that got to do with corporations?

            you can

            The people making these laws wouldn’t care if they understood, wouldn’t undersrand if they knew, and absolutely aren’t interested in knowing. Basically ever.

          • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            And what about all the companies that use VPNs? Do they just shut down because the government made them illegal?

            Just literally told you how. One line. Easy. Just declare VPN usage illegal for the common plebeian or when not credentialed with a company that is reporting to the government. Ez pz.

              • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                17 days ago

                The purpose of a ban is not necessarily to 100% remove use. A law can not, by definition, make something happen or not happen (think eg.: speed cap in traffic law). It does give the lawhandler permission to remove your rights if you are “found” to be infringing.

    • sleepundertheleaves@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      If I was a repressive government, I wouldn’t want to ban VPNs. What I’d want is identity verification before you booted the VPN up, ideally in the form of some program or application running on your device, so that I, the repressive government, can track what you do through the VPN.

      If I was a repressive government, I would want my citizens to be secure from non-governmental threats, if for no other reason than to my government look better.

      Besides, if it helps, VPNs are really hard to ban. China has been trying for decades now without much success.

      • iii@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        Besides, if it helps, VPNs are really hard to ban. China has been trying for decades now without much success.

        It’s better to have it be illegal, and available. That way the government can selectively prosecute and punish (political) opponents.