As Texas Republicans try to muscle a rare mid-decade redistricting bill through the Legislature to help Republicans gain seats in Congress – at President Donald Trump’s request – residents in Austin, the state capital, could find themselves sharing a district with rural Texans more than 300 miles away.

The proposed map chops up Central Texas’ 37th Congressional District, which is currently represented by Democrat Rep. Lloyd Doggett, will be consumed by four neighboring districts, three of which Republicans now hold.

One of those portions of the Austin-area district was drawn to be part of the 11th District that Republican Rep. August Pfluger represents, which stretches into rural Ector County, about 20 miles away from the New Mexico border.

      • greygore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        It started in 1812. Although the Democratic-Republican party did evolve into the current Democratic party over the course of two centuries, it’s hardly fair to call them the same party. That’s eight generations between then and now and the political landscape has changed dramatically.

        As for the “both sides do it” whataboutism, like so many “both sides” issues the current Republican Party benefits far more from gerrymandering than the current Democratic Party, and this is before this especially egregious Texas mid-census redistricting.

        • AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s such a silly and disingenuous argument. The most recent version of gerrymandering arguably began with REDMAP in 2010, which was in response to Obama winning. Before that, it was used almost exclusively to disenfranchise black voters before the voting rights act in 1965. Before that, it was used by both parties in unison to maintain the supremacy of incumbents.

      • Soulg@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        If you think that the Democrats are the only ones to gerrymander until now you’re not intelligent enough to be weighing in

        • Dagwood_Sanwich@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          They both do it. Democrats are just the ones who invented it, then like everything they do, they cry victim when the Republicans also do it and try to act like they’re filled with righteous indignation knowing that they also jerrymander.

          • AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            The American system adopted it from across the pond. Rotten and pocket burroughs were frequent in the 18th century and actually started getting outlawed in the 19th century right when the Jeffersonian republicans went hard with it.

            The Jeffersonian republican/democratic republican is the father of both major parties, it split into the northern republicans (anti- slavery) and southern democrats (mostly pro-slavery).

            Neither of those parties resemble the modern parties, which flipped ideologies during the Civil Rights Movement, among their most recent changes.

            So, it would be safer to say that American gerrymandering was created by the precursor to both modern parties.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        They always forget that the laws they pass to punish their enemies or enrich themselves goes both ways.

        If they start acting like the law is anything they can get away with without going to jail, then the same can apply to the rest of us.

      • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        And so many things were just ‘common sense,’ and not enshrined in laws because the thought was that anyone breaking them would be held accountable by the populace. We now have a critical mass of stupid, self absorbed, or malicious people that laws don’t matter, much less norms.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          We also have mechanisms of communication, propaganda, and control that were beyond imagination 249 years ago.

          I mean, a second Trump term means that any “but surely they wouldn’t accept somebody who-” is out the window. His two impeachments weren’t for affairs or for perjury. They were EACH for betraying the damned country in totally different ways.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      The pretense is gone now though, which is fascinating. And scary.

      It’s literally just partisan warfare with legal exploitation, and voter bases apparently think it’s justified. I mean, what are they gonna do, side with the other party over it?

    • iridebikes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Federal government won’t do anything about it. States control their own elections and therein lies the conundrum. Texas is proving very willingly that it doesn’t care about the rules as long as they win.

        • Soulg@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          The Democrats proposed a bill last congress to ban gerrymandering and every single Republican voted against it.

          • Dagwood_Sanwich@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            It was also full of Democrat shenanigans that they knew the Republicans would not vote for, so they tossed in jerrymandering, knowing the bill would never pass to make it look like they were for it.

            Without jerrymandering, the Democrats would lose many seats because they’d no longer be able to take large swaths of rural and suburban areas, then make a wonky looking maps to link them to cities to ensure the suburban and rural voters get outvoted by the urban voters. They’d also no longer be able to carve out mostly black districts that they have no chance of ever losing.

            Without their jerrymandering, they wouldn’t have single party control of Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

            • freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              You can’t spell “gerrymander” even after replying to people who spelled it correctly… and even being that wrong, it’s the most accurate thing you’ve written.

              Republicans have gerrymandered Utah, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Tennessee, N. Carolina, S. Carolina, Wisconsin, Arkansas, Ohio and Mississippi.

              Democrats have gerrymandered New Mexico, Nevada, Illinois, and Oregon.

              What’s even more hilarious is that you named Vermont as being gerrymandered… it has ONE congressional district, LOL… ONE! That’s some big-brain analysis, my friend.