• Axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Flatpaks are good, especially compared to snap.

    The future is atomic OS’s like silverblue, which will make heavy use of things like flatpak.

    • Yozul@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Atomic distros are cool, and I’m sure they will only get more popular, but I don’t buy the idea that they’re “The” future. They have their place, but they can’t really completely replace traditional distros. Not every new thing needs to kill everything that came before it.

      • Libra00@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Haven’t had much opportunity to use snap, what’s the problem with them?

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          For me, it’s the unrenameable, unmoveable, non-hidden snap directory in my home directory’s root that doesn’t even follow the naming convention of the other directories in there.

          • HayadSont@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            22 days ago

            > plus sudden updates that nuke active applications.

            This is not what’s supposed to happen. If an app installed through flatpak is active while it’s receiving an update, then the update is not supposed to affect the running application until it’s closed/restarted.

            Edit: Somehow I didn’t realize the concern was raised against Snap and not Flatpak.