• Lung@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Problem is billionaires don’t make “income” and it’s quite difficult to even know what they own, let alone how to tax something like unrealized gains on stock holdings that they are using as leverage to get loans

    • logicbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      At some point, somebody convinced people that unrealized gains were not actually income because you don’t know for sure that you’d make that money, and I think that was a bad idea. Maybe unrealized gains aren’t 1:1 the same thing as income, but the calculations of an income equivalent aren’t going to be complicated.

        • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          This exactly. At some threshold of worth, you should get taxed an amount based on your worth that will be big enough to force you to realize some gains in order to pay it.

          • bus_factor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            The issue with realizing the gains is that you have to relinquish control of your company bit by bit. However, you could have the company (which you likely control) give out dividends, or you could use the stock as collateral for a loan. Or just pay yourself a bigger salary.