• RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    No $80, theyre going to stick with $70.

    Fools stupid people into thinking theyre being generous. Same tactic gas companies keep doing in California to raise gas prices. Price goes up almost $2 per gallon, and then back down only $1.

    At least with video games we don’t have to buy them to live.

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Not enough sales data from Nintendo’s little experiment yet. Don’t hold your breath, ‘this stage’ won’t last.

  • absquatulate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Love how fast they all dial back after seeing the reaction on nintendo’s 80$ approach. But seriously EA I don’t care for those extra 10 bucks upfronf if your games are still the mtx and gambling infested shit they currently are.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t understand looking at Sims 4 as an example. The game has had progressive additions for a long time; it’s basically a live service game, and now comes free.

        It’s rare for anyone to feel they want all the DLC - usually it would just be a few things they want and have fun with.

        • LettyWhiterock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          I actually do want all the DLC in a game like that. The fact it’s prohibitively expensive just means I’ve never actually bought any and stick to the Sims 3, a game where I do have all the expansions.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      The base price increase would still raise the total with DLC. Not including the DLC is still worth talking about, since there are plenty of ways to enjoy a game without it.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Ya like being a patient gamer haha.

        I have such a backlog of stuff I wanna play that I just wishlist it and when the price feels right down the line I’ll buy it for the backlog.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        That the game is broken up into parts to charge more instead of, you know, making the game feature-rich in the first place.

        • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          do you not agree most games ARE feature rich in the first place? I mean compared to old $60 games.

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            The ones by big publishers? No, they’re feature complete at best for the sake of the game loop but sell the rest in overpriced DLCs. The base game is the hook, that’s why Epic keeps giving some away for free or are sold at a heavy discount on Steam. You only need to scroll down to notice.

  • UndergroundGoblin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Fuck EA. If they dont offer an appropriated support, I will never buy any games from them again.

    Multimillion Dollar company but 0,0% real, human support. If you can’t login your account, you’r fucked. Your account is gone.